I am a free market believer and limitations might be understood as one of my lacking abilities to comprehend and understand.

In fact by believing in a free market I am aware and set my own limitations rather than obtaining the limitations that society applies on me.

In other words I choose more personal risk in life than people who enjoys the society keeping walls around them.

I am all for law and order, but I am not in favor of society deciding what I should do with my life and where to spend my time doing it.

Let’s say there is two families, both with one child just recently born.

Family one enjoys the social walls of society as having two jobs, child in kindergarten from age of 10 months* old and stays there all day until five in the afternoon.

Family two enjoys the free liberty of society with choosing to have one job, child at home with one parent after turning 10 months* and chooses to do some partial income work at home while her/his child is resting/playing.

*in Norway we have 10 months full income support for one working parent

What family would you choose to be? Why is the free liberty family having a much harder possibility to succeed with their choice in the world of today in comparison to family one?

It’s all about the structure of society, it has built in limitations to have a free choice and makes it hard to choose to be with their own child from birth. Isn’t that even remotely strange to you?

Was it always like this? No. Just a few decades ago it was normally one income to support the whole family. Today most families have no choice, but to have two incomes if they are to keep a sustainable living, like it once was. Strange, yet again, huh?

Fair enough, one normal income can be achieved today as well, but that means so many limitations on spending that you might risk living poorly.

The point here is the following; Government support you with kindergartens for your children up to the age of six and then they get their first day at school.

By doing this “favor” for you as a parent, they are actually socializing your child into a system where you basically have no power to influence your own child.

In Norway they support you with a fixed price for having the child accommodated 8-10 hours a day, so you actually pay a price around 10% of one normal income for this service (heavily subsidized with taxes, the real cost is way higher).

If you choose to stay home with your child, you do get support of around 20% of one normal income up to the child is 3 years of age. Then you are basically forced into having the child accommodated in kindergartens, if you are not so lucky as having one successful income in the family.

Doesn’t anyone see the danger in this? I believe the child should be with her mum the first years and really grow that bond which is needed most when the child is older. This implies more responsible parents, parents with an actual choice to be responsible with learning, nurturing and bonding with the child as intended.

I even know of people that has been approved for Harvard (the school we’ve all heard about) that has been home schooled all of her life. What does that tell?

I believe that the majority of the socialized children will have a much worse outcome than if they were to be with their parents bonding as much as possible, because with bonding they will come back to you for advices in life and you are therefore also taking responsibility in giving the best answer you possibly can.

I am thankful for being aware and that I am not letting myself be socialized by force, that I will make a choice with my family and prepare to be free, because one day the structure will try to take away my freedom of choice, by financially forcing me to choose their path. Socialists call this free will.